Poverty environment relationship – UGC NET Question

In many developing regions, poor households rely directly on common forests, grazing lands and water bodies for fuel, fodder and livelihoods. When these resources are degraded through overuse or external pressures, the poor lose crucial support systems. This can trap them in a vicious circle where poverty drives resource overuse, and degradation further entrenches poverty. Therefore, the statement linking heavy dependence with vulnerability to environmental degradation accurately describes the poverty–environment nexus.

Option A:
Option A is correct because it recognises the two-way relationship: poverty can force people to exploit resources unsustainably, and the resulting degradation can push them deeper into deprivation. This understanding underlies many community-based and sustainable livelihood programmes.

Option B:
Option B is incorrect since poor households do use natural resources extensively, often with limited alternatives. Ignoring their role misrepresents both their dependence and their potential contribution to conservation when given secure rights.

Option C:
Option C is incorrect because environmental damage is not caused only by rich households. While high consumption by the wealthy has large footprints, the survival needs of the poor also shape land use and resource conditions.

Option D:
Option D is incorrect as numerous studies show that poverty and environment are closely linked in developing contexts. Policies often try to address both together through integrated rural development and natural resource management.