The series can be generated using the expression 2n² + 1 for consecutive integers n. For n = 1 to 5 we obtain 2(1)² + 1 = 3, 2(2)² + 1 = 9, 2(3)² + 1 = 19, 2(4)² + 1 = 33 and 2(5)² + 1 = 51. The next integer is 6, so the next term should be 2(6)² + 1. This equals 2 × 36 + 1 = 72 + 1 = 73, which is consistent with the pattern.
Option A:
Option A gives 73, which exactly matches the formula 2n² + 1 when n = 6. The extended sequence 3, 9, 19, 33, 51, 73 is generated smoothly from one algebraic rule. This confirms that 73 is the correct continuation of the number series.
Option B:
Option B suggests 71, which does not satisfy the expression 2n² + 1 for any integer following 5 in this context. Using 71 would break the simple polynomial structure underlying the series. Therefore, 71 cannot be the correct next term.
Option C:
Option C provides 75, which also fails to match 2n² + 1 for the next integer. It introduces an inconsistent jump that is not supported by the existing values. Hence, 75 is not in harmony with the pattern of the sequence.
Option D:
Option D offers 77, which similarly does not correspond to 2n² + 1 for n = 6 or any immediate extension. Including 77 would abandon the clear quadratic rule. Thus, 77 is not the appropriate choice.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!