Statements A, B, C, D and E correctly describe the five members of the Nyaya parÄrthÄnumÄna, whereas F is false. PratijĆ±Ä presents the thesis about the pakį¹£a, hetu gives the reason, udÄharaį¹a supplies a universal example, upanaya applies that universal relation to the pakį¹£a and nigamana concludes the inference. The ordered presentation is meant to clarify both the general vyÄpti and its specific application, so it is neither arbitrary nor insignificant. Therefore F must be rejected.
Option A:
Option A is correct because it includes the full and accurate description of each step in the five-member syllogism and excludes F, which denies the significance of their order. It aligns with standard Nyaya accounts used in UGC NET Indian logic questions. Hence A, B, C, D and E only is the right choice.
Option B:
Option B is incomplete as it omits E, thereby failing to mention nigamana, the final restatement of the conclusion. Without E, the overall structure of the syllogism is left unfinished. Therefore A, B, C and D only cannot be accepted.
Option C:
Option C is wrong since it omits A and includes only B, C, D and E. Without A, the role of pratijĆ±Ä as the thesis about the pakį¹£a is absent, leaving the syllogism without its starting claim. This omission makes B, C, D and E only an inadequate combination.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it omits B and presents only A, C, D and E. Without B, the explicit statement of hetu as the reason is missing, which is central to the syllogistic structure. Thus A, C, D and E only cannot represent all the correct statements.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!