D and E are wrong because they reverse the meanings of tautology and contingency. A tautology is true in all possible situations, not always false, and a contingent proposition is true in some situations and false in others, not true in all. Statements A and B correctly describe what counts as a statement in logic, and C accurately expresses the idea that contradictory statements cannot both be true simultaneously. Thus the pair D and E only is the correct set of wrong statements.
Option A:
Option A is incorrect because it selects D alone, but E is also wrong; contingent propositions are not true in all possible situations. By ignoring E, Option A fails to identify all the incorrect statements.
Option B:
Option B is also incorrect because it focuses only on E and ignores D, which misdefines tautology as always false. Since both D and E are wrong, singling out only one of them does not satisfy the requirement of the question.
Option C:
Option C is correct because it groups together D and E, the two statements that misrepresent the key logical categories of tautology and contingency. It leaves A, B and C untouched, acknowledging that they are true characterisations of statements and contradictions.
Option D:
Option D is wrong because it includes C, which is actually true: contradictory statements cannot both be true at the same time. By treating C as if it were wrong along with D, this option misidentifies the logical property of contradiction.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!