NEP 2020 respects the RTE Act as the main legal instrument guaranteeing free and compulsory education, and suggests reviewing it so that its coverage can extend from the current 6–14 range to ages 3–18 in line with the policy vision.
Option A:
The policy does not propose repealing the RTE Act; instead, it stresses its importance and calls for better implementation and possible extension.
Option B:
NEP 2020 does not ignore the RTE Act; it explicitly refers to it and seeks to align policy goals with this existing legal framework.
Option C:
This option correctly captures NEP’s stance that policy and law must work together: NEP sets the vision of universal schooling from ages 3 to 18, while the RTE Act may need to be updated to match that vision.
Option D:
Limiting the RTE Act only to private schools would contradict its core purpose, which focuses strongly on government and aided schools as well as obligations for private schools.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!