The principle of individual differences recognizes that learners vary in abilities, interests, backgrounds and learning styles. Effective teaching therefore cannot treat all students as identical copies. Instead, instruction must be adapted to accommodate these differences so that each learner can progress. Hence, when teachers design instruction considering prior knowledge and interests, they are acting on the principle of individual differences.
Option A:
Strict uniformity assumes that all learners are essentially the same and should be taught in exactly the same way and at the same pace. This assumption is contradicted by everyday classroom experience and research in educational psychology. Therefore, it cannot justify differentiated instructional design.
Option B:
External control emphasizes authority and regulation imposed from outside the learner, such as strict rules or surveillance. While some control is necessary, it does not explain why instruction should be tailored to prior knowledge or preferences. Thus, this option is conceptually unrelated to the principle in question.
Option C:
Random variation suggests that differences among learners are purely accidental and have no systematic implications for teaching. If teachers accepted this view, there would be little reason to plan instruction around known learner characteristics. Therefore, it does not support the deliberate design described in the stem.
Option D:
Individual differences refer to systematic variations among learners in cognitive, affective and psychomotor characteristics. Recognizing these differences leads teachers to use varied methods, materials and pacing. This option accurately captures the principle underlying instruction that is sensitive to prior knowledge, interests and learning preferences.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!