Statements A and C together reflect the multilingual reality and pedagogic rationale for language choices in higher education. Statement A is true because many programmes are offered in English and in regional or bilingual formats. Statement C is also true since use of languages that students understand well generally enhances comprehension and engagement. Statement B is false because NEP 2020 encourages use of Indian languages rather than mandating English-only instruction. Statement D is false as institutions are encouraged, not prohibited, from developing materials in Indian languages. Therefore, A and C only are correct.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete because it mentions the variety of media of instruction but does not explicitly state the pedagogic benefits that are captured in statement C.
Option B:
Option B is incorrect because it chooses only C and leaves out A, thereby failing to acknowledge the actual multilingual and bilingual practices recognised in policy and implementation.
Option C:
Option C is correct as it combines Aโs description of existing language practices with Cโs explanation of why learner-friendly language use matters, while excluding B and D, which misrepresent NEP 2020 and institutional freedom.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it adds D, which wrongly claims prohibition of Indian language material, and thus contradicts both policy and practice around language in higher education.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!