Here the pattern is aₙ = n⁴ + 2n³ + 1 with n starting from 1. For n = 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 we obtain 1+2+1 = 4, 16+16+1 = 33, 81+54+1 = 136, 256+128+1 = 385 and 625+250+1 = 876, which matches the sequence exactly. For n = 6 we compute 6⁴+2·6³+1 = 1296+432+1 = 1729. Therefore 1729 continues the exact same quartic-plus-cubic pattern and is the correct next term.
Option A:
Option A, 1713, is smaller than the formula’s output and does not equal n⁴+2n³+1 for n = 6. It would imply subtracting 16 from the correct value without any justification in the earlier terms. Hence option A violates the established algebraic rule and is incorrect.
Option B:
Option B, 1729, matches precisely the result from the expression n⁴+2n³+1 when n = 6. It maintains the same combination of powers of n that generated all previous numbers in the series. Because no change to the functional relationship is needed, this option correctly extends the sequence.
Option C:
Option C, 1735, slightly overshoots the correct value and again fails to satisfy the expression for n = 6. Choosing 1735 would mean adding an arbitrary 6 only at the last step, which is inconsistent with the pattern. Therefore option C cannot be the correct answer.
Option D:
Option D, 1745, is even further from the predicted value and has no basis in the rule aₙ = n⁴ + 2n³ + 1. Using 1745 would destroy the exact mapping between the index and the term values. Thus option D is not a valid continuation of the given series.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!