The first-level differences are 7, 13, 21 and 31. The second-level differences are 6, 8 and 10, which increase by 2 each time. Continuing this pattern, the next second-level difference should be 12, so the next first-level difference becomes 31 + 12 = 43. Adding 43 to the last term 76 gives 119, making 119 the only value that preserves the consistent second-level arithmetic structure.
Option A:
Option A gives 119, which fits the calculated first-level difference of 43 and keeps the second-level differences as 6, 8, 10, 12. This maintains a neat progression where the growth of the gaps is itself arithmetic. Because both layers of the pattern remain intact, 119 is the correct continuation of the series.
Option B:
Option B gives 115, which would imply a difference of 39 from 76. That would make the second-level differences 6, 8, 10 and 8, breaking the steady increase by 2 and introducing an inconsistency. Hence 115 does not follow the underlying logic of the sequence.
Option C:
Option C gives 123, corresponding to a difference of 47 from 76. This would yield second-level differences 6, 8, 10 and 16, which jumps too sharply and does not respect the +2 progression. Therefore 123 cannot be accepted as the next term.
Option D:
Option D gives 127, leading to a difference of 51 from 76. The resulting second-level differences become 6, 8, 10 and 20, distorting the smooth pattern of increase. Thus 127 is not compatible with the observed structure of the series.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!