Statements A, B and C describe standard facts about implication. A gives the important equivalence p → q ≡ ¬p ∨ q. B correctly states that an implication is false only when the antecedent is true and the consequent false. C correctly identifies the contrapositive as ¬q → ¬p. D is false because ¬p → ¬q is the inverse, not the converse, and E is false since p → q is generally not equivalent to q → p. Therefore A, B and C only are correct.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete because it omits C and thus fails to mention the contrapositive, which is central to reasoning with implications in many NET questions.
Option B:
Option B is incorrect as it includes D, which mislabels the inverse as the converse and therefore misuses terminology in logic.
Option C:
Option C is wrong because it omits A and therefore drops a key equivalence used to simplify implications.
Option D:
Option D is correct since it combines the truth-table characterisation of implication, the disjunctive form and the contrapositive, while excluding D and E, which contain conceptual errors about converse and equivalence.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!