If A and B share profits in the ratio 7:9, the total number of parts is 7 + 9 = 16. Each part is worth ₹1,60,000 ÷ 16 = ₹10,000. A’s share is 7 × ₹10,000 = ₹70,000 and B’s share is 9 × ₹10,000 = ₹90,000. The difference between their shares is ₹90,000 − ₹70,000 = ₹20,000.
Option A:
Option A is correct because it directly reflects the difference between 7 parts and 9 parts when each part is ₹10,000. The arithmetic shows that the financial gap between A and B is exactly two parts, which equals ₹20,000. This fits both the total profit and the specified sharing ratio.
Option B:
Option B, ₹22,000, would not correspond to an integer number of ratio parts, given that each part is ₹10,000. It would imply a difference of 2.2 parts, which contradicts the whole-number nature of the ratio 7:9 and the discrete sharing of profit.
Option C:
Option C, ₹24,000, would amount to a difference of 2.4 parts, which again is inconsistent with the ratio 7:9. Using this figure would mean the implied total profit cannot be exactly ₹1,60,000 when aligned with the ratio.
Option D:
Option D, ₹25,000, suggests an even more irregular difference and would break the connection between the ratio parts and the fixed total profit. When we reverse-calculate, no whole-number ratio 7:9 with a total of 16 parts yields a difference of ₹25,000, so this option is impossible under the given conditions.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!