In logical reasoning, an argument is a connected group of statements in which one statement is presented as the conclusion. The remaining statements function as premises that support this conclusion. This structure of claim plus supporting reasons is exactly what the stem describes. Therefore the appropriate name for such a set of statements is an argument.
Option A:
Option A names argument, which is defined as premises offered in support of a conclusion. It captures both the inferential claim and the supporting reasons. Hence it precisely fits the description given in the question.
Option B:
Option B refers to an explanation, which clarifies why something happens or is the case. Explanations may use reasons, but they usually assume the truth of what is explained rather than argue for it. Thus explanation is not the general label for the structure mentioned in the stem.
Option C:
Option C, description, simply reports or depicts a situation without drawing an inferred claim. Descriptive sentences can all be true yet still fail to support a particular conclusion. Therefore a description does not match the idea of premises leading to a conclusion.
Option D:
Option D, illustration, presents examples to make a general claim clearer. Illustrations presuppose the claim instead of offering premises to justify it. Hence illustration alone does not constitute an argument in the logical sense required here.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!