The reflective level of teaching is the highest level in the classic hierarchy, where learners deal with complex, unfamiliar situations and must think critically. It demands that students analyse, synthesise and evaluate information rather than simply recall or comprehend it. At this level, teaching encourages problem-solving, hypothesis testing and independent judgment. Because the stem explicitly mentions problem-solving, critical thinking and original insight, it clearly corresponds to the reflective level of teaching.
Option A:
Memory level teaching is confined to rote recall of learned material and does not require learners to generate new ideas or solutions. It cannot account for the emphasis on problem-solving and original insight described in the stem. Hence, it is not the correct level here.
Option B:
Drill level, if used informally, would imply repeated practice of the same tasks to build accuracy and speed. Such practice rarely engages higher-order thinking or critical reflection. Therefore, this option does not match the complex cognitive demands highlighted in the question.
Option C:
Understanding level teaching ensures that learners grasp meanings and can explain relationships, but it may not always require them to tackle novel problems or critically evaluate alternatives. While it is more advanced than memory level, it stops short of the sustained problem-solving and insight typical of reflective level teaching. Thus, it does not fully fit the description given.
Option D:
Reflective level teaching invites learners to question assumptions, compare competing explanations and propose their own solutions. They must justify their reasoning and learn from errors in judgment. Since the stem focuses on these advanced cognitive activities, reflective level is the most appropriate completion.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!