UGC NET Questions (Paper – 1)

Good research follows a planned and organized procedure instead of haphazard steps. It uses logical reasoning to link concepts, methods and conclusions. Empirical evidence, collected through appropriate tools, supports or refutes the researcher’s propositions. These features together ensure that research findings are credible, verifiable and useful.

Option A:
Option A overemphasizes personal preferences, which can introduce bias and subjectivity. While researchers’ interests matter in topic selection, sound research cannot be guided only by personal likes or dislikes. It must conform to methodological standards beyond individual preferences.

Option B:
Option B correctly combines systematic planning, logical reasoning and reliance on empirical data. These elements are repeatedly emphasized in research methodology texts as marks of quality inquiry. By grounding conclusions in observable evidence and coherent argument, this characteristic distinguishes good research from casual opinion.

Option C:
Option C highlights unverified assumptions and guesses, which may serve as starting ideas but cannot remain unexamined. Research must test assumptions rather than rely on them blindly. If guesses are not subjected to evidence, the work remains speculative rather than scientific.

Option D:
Option D suggests avoiding literature, which would isolate the study from existing knowledge. A good study always situates itself in prior work to avoid duplication, build on established findings and identify gaps. Ignoring literature reduces both relevance and rigor.