Environmental justice emphasises fair distribution of environmental benefits and burdens and meaningful participation of affected communities. Forced displacement without proper compensation or rehabilitation imposes heavy burdens on already vulnerable groups. The stem describes precisely such unfair treatment in the name of development,which is a violation of environmental justice. Hence Option B is correct.
Option A:
Efficiency concerns achieving outcomes with minimal cost or resource use and does not address fairness in burden sharing. A project could be economically efficient yet highly unjust,so Option A misses the central issue in the question.
Option B:
Justice focuses on equity,rights and fair procedures. In environmental contexts it demands that no group be disproportionately harmed by projects and that communities have a voice in decisions. This fits the dam displacement scenario.
Option C:
Neutrality suggests taking no side,but environmental conflicts require explicit consideration of power imbalances and rights. Neutrality does not capture the fairness concerns raised in the stem,so Option C is not suitable.
Option D:
Marketing relates to promoting products or ideas. It is not a principle governing fair treatment of displaced communities and thus cannot complete the statement correctly.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!