Pramana is the technical term used in Indian epistemology to denote a reliable instrument or means of valid knowledge. It focuses on the process or channel through which true cognition arises, such as perception or inference. By identifying pramana, philosophers can distinguish trustworthy cognitions from error. Therefore, the generic means described in the stem is correctly called pramana.
Option A:
Option A is correct because pramana names the epistemic instrument, like perception or testimony, that causally and justificatorily connects the knower to the object. It captures the idea of a route that, when functioning properly, produces non-contradicted, fruitful cognition. In pramana theory, the classification of different pramanas is central to understanding how knowledge is grounded.
Option B:
Option B, prameya, denotes the object that is known, such as a pot or a sound, and is thus the target of knowledge rather than the means that produces it. Treating prameya as a means would confuse the distinction between epistemic instrument and object. Hence prameya cannot fill the blank in this definition.
Option C:
Option C, pramiti, is the valid cognition itself, the resultant knowledge occurring in the mind after the pramana has operated. It is an epistemic product rather than the instrumentive factor highlighted in the question. Identifying pramiti with pramana would collapse the processโproduct distinction.
Option D:
Option D, pramata, refers to the knower or epistemic subject who employs pramanas to gain knowledge of prameyas. While essential to the knowledge situation, the pramata is not described as the instrument that generates cognition. Therefore pramata does not match the stem.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!