UGC NET Questions (Paper – 1)

Ask Your Question All Questions Join the Community to clear Your Doubts
Reset
Moderate
U6 ā€“ Logical Reasoning and Indian Logic
Practice
Concepts: hetu and sadhya Indian logic examples Nyaya inference sapaksha and vipaksha UGC NET syllabus vyapti relation

Q: Which of the following statements about vyāpti (invariable concomitance) in Indian logic are correct?

(A) Vyāpti expresses a universal relation between hetu (reason) and sādhya (probandum);
(B) Vyāpti is often established through repeated observation of concomitance in sapakį¹£a cases and absence in vipakį¹£a cases;
(C) Without vyāpti, inference cannot yield valid knowledge in Nyaya;
(D) A single accidental coincidence of smoke and fire is sufficient to establish vyāpti for all future inferences;
(E) In UGC NET questions, examples like ā€œwhere there is smoke, there is fireā€ illustrate the idea of vyāpti;
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Scroll to Top