Statements A, B, C, D and F correctly describe how common connectives are handled when mapped into logic, while E is false. “Either p or q” is often inclusive in exams unless exclusivity is clearly indicated, and “neither…nor…” translates naturally as a conjunction of negations. The pattern for “exactly one” uses both disjunction and the negation of conjunction, and “both p and q” is simply conjunction. Because natural language “or” is context-sensitive, misreading it can cause mistakes, so F is right and E, which claims uniformity in all contexts, is wrong.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete as it leaves out F, which highlights the practical consequence of misinterpreting these connectives in exam situations. While A, B, C and D give accurate translations, they do not address how errors in interpretation affect performance. Thus A, B, C and D only does not fully answer the question.
Option B:
Option B is wrong because it includes E, which falsely states that natural language “or” always matches inclusive disjunction. In reality, “or” can be exclusive in many everyday contexts, so accepting E misrepresents typical usage. Including a false statement means this combination cannot be correct.
Option C:
Option C is incorrect since it omits A and includes only B, C, D and F. Without A, the usual exam practice regarding the interpretation of “either…or…” is not mentioned, which is central to the question. Consequently, this option does not contain all of the correct statements in the list.
Option D:
Option D is correct because it collects all the true statements A, B, C, D and F and properly excludes E, which overgeneralises about the meaning of “or”. It provides both the formal translations and the warning about misinterpretation in UGC NET reasoning.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!