Statements A and B are fundamental facts about complements, D describes the multiplication rule for independent events and E is true because working with complements, like “at least one” via “1 − P(none)”, often simplifies calculations. Statement C is false because for mutually exclusive events, P(A and B) = 0, not P(A) + P(B), which is instead P(A or B) for such events. Therefore, the combination A, B, D and E only is correct.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete since it omits E and thus does not state explicitly the strategic advantage of using complementary events to simplify some NET probability questions.
Option B:
Option B is also incomplete because it leaves out D, thereby ignoring the key rule for independent events, which is central to many probability computations. Without D, the treatment of joint events is missing.
Option C:
Option C is wrong because it excludes A and consequently fails to express the basic identity P(A) + P(not A) = 1, and it still does not remove C, the incorrect equality about mutually exclusive events.
Option D:
Option D is correct as it collects all true statements and rejects C, which confuses “and” with “or” probabilities for mutually exclusive events. It represents how complementary and independent events are used in exam-level problems.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!