UGC NET Questions (Paper – 1)

Statements A, B, D and E align with widely accepted accessibility principles, whereas C and F undermine inclusive design. Relying solely on colour can disadvantage users with colour vision deficiencies, and ignoring accessibility until someone discloses a disability is reactive rather than proactive. Text alternatives, keyboard access and captions support many users, while universal design benefits everyone. Hence, the combination A, B, D and E only is correct.

Option A:
Option A is correct because it selects statements that reflect proactive, universal design thinking. It recognises that accessible ICT features assist a wide range of learners and should be built in from the outset.

Option B:
Option B is incorrect because it includes C, which recommends using colour alone to convey key information. This practice violates basic accessibility guidance and can make content unusable for some learners.

Option C:
Option C is incorrect because it accepts F, which implies institutions may safely ignore accessibility until a disability is disclosed. Such an approach can create barriers and legal risks, so F cannot be part of a correct set.

Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it combines true statements A and D with F. Accepting F means endorsing a wait-and-see approach to accessibility, contrary to the principle of designing for all users from the beginning.

Statements A, B and C accurately describe how ICT tools can support inclusive education, while statement D is clearly wrong. Assistive technologies like screen readers, captions and display customisation are designed to widen participation by providing alternative modes of access. D misinterprets inclusive education by suggesting a single text-heavy approach, which would actually exclude many learners. Therefore the only wrong statement is D, and the correct option is the one that selects D only.

Option A:
Option A is incorrect because it treats both A and D as wrong statements. Statement A is a core example of assistive technology enabling visually impaired learners to access digital text. Combining a correct statement with the wrong one means this option does not match the requirement to identify only the wrong statements.

Option B:
Option B is correct because it isolates D, highlighting that the claim about mandatory text-heavy e-books contradicts the principle of providing multiple accessible formats. It implicitly acknowledges that A, B and C are valid strategies for supporting a range of learner needs.

Option C:
Option C is incorrect because it labels A, B and C as the only correct statements but does not answer the prompt, which asks for wrong statements. Moreover, this option does not identify D as wrong, so it fails to respond to the question accurately.

Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it treats all four statements as if they could be chosen together, thereby accepting D as acceptable practice. Since D contradicts the idea of flexibility and multiple formats that define inclusion, it cannot be part of a correct combination.