Accessibility design for ICT – UGC NET Question

Statements A, B, D and E align with widely accepted accessibility principles, whereas C and F undermine inclusive design. Relying solely on colour can disadvantage users with colour vision deficiencies, and ignoring accessibility until someone discloses a disability is reactive rather than proactive. Text alternatives, keyboard access and captions support many users, while universal design benefits everyone. Hence, the combination A, B, D and E only is correct.

Option A:
Option A is correct because it selects statements that reflect proactive, universal design thinking. It recognises that accessible ICT features assist a wide range of learners and should be built in from the outset.

Option B:
Option B is incorrect because it includes C, which recommends using colour alone to convey key information. This practice violates basic accessibility guidance and can make content unusable for some learners.

Option C:
Option C is incorrect because it accepts F, which implies institutions may safely ignore accessibility until a disability is disclosed. Such an approach can create barriers and legal risks, so F cannot be part of a correct set.

Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it combines true statements A and D with F. Accepting F means endorsing a wait-and-see approach to accessibility, contrary to the principle of designing for all users from the beginning.