Statements A and B give correct definitions of union and intersection, D correctly states that the empty set is a subset of every set and E is true because many reasoning problems about groups naturally use set models and sometimes Venn diagrams. Statement C is false since the complement of A in U consists of elements of U that are not in A, not elements that are in both A and U. Therefore, the combination A, B, D and E only is correct.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete because it omits E and so does not mention the common application of set theory to practical reasoning questions in exams. Without E, the conceptual link to aptitude problems is weakened.
Option B:
Option B is also incomplete as it leaves out A and therefore fails to give the basic description of union, which is central to understanding combined categories in reasoning questions.
Option C:
Option C is wrong because it includes C, which misdescribes complement, and omits E, ignoring the modelling role of sets. Including a false statement invalidates the option.
Option D:
Option D is correct as it keeps all true statements while excluding C, the incorrect account of complement. It aligns with the formal set-theoretic framework used for UGC NET reasoning items.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!