NyÄya draws a sharp line between pramÄ (valid cognition) and apramÄ (invalid cognition such as illusion or doubt). PramÄ arises when an appropriate pramÄį¹a operates in proper conditions and yields a true representation of its object. This focus on truth and reliability is central to NyÄyaās epistemology and its evaluation of different sources of knowledge.
Option A:
Option A is too broad, since NyÄya does not call every cognition pramÄ; erroneous or illusory cognitions are classed as apramÄ.
Option B:
Option B correctly captures pramÄ as veridical knowledge produced by a recognised pramÄį¹a under suitable conditions.
Option C:
Option C narrows pramÄ unjustifiably to scriptural knowledge; while Åabda can generate pramÄ, so can perception and inference.
Option D:
Option D restricts pramÄ to perceptual knowledge, but NyÄya explicitly accepts inferential and testimonial pramÄs as well.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!