UGC NET Questions (Paper – 1)

Statements A, C, D and E correctly describe statement–conclusion reasoning. A is true because a conclusion must be a reasonable inference from what is stated. C is correct in that valid syllogistic conclusions follow necessarily from premises. D is true; sometimes more than one conclusion is logically supported. E is correct because unsupported personal opinions do not qualify as conclusions based on the statement. B is false since a conclusion that contradicts the given statement is generally weak or invalid. Thus A, C, D and E only are correct.

Option A:
Option A is incomplete as it omits E, failing to emphasise that conclusions must be grounded in the statement rather than personal views, an important exam guideline.

Option B:
Option B is incorrect because it includes B, which wrongly treats contradictions as strong conclusions, and so mixes one false statement with true ones.

Option C:
Option C is wrong since it leaves out A and includes only C, D and E, thereby omitting the foundational idea of what a conclusion is in statement–conclusion questions.

Option D:
Option D is correct because it gathers all accurate points about necessity, multiplicity and support of conclusions, while excluding B, which misrepresents strong conclusions.