UGC NET Questions (Paper – 1)

The significance of the study section articulates why the proposed research matters for theory, practice or policy. It explains how the findings might fill gaps, resolve controversies or improve professional practice. This rationale helps reviewers see the value of investing time and resources in the work. Therefore, the part of the proposal that discusses contributions is correctly titled the significance of the study.

Option A:
Objectives specify what the researcher plans to achieve in the form of concrete aims, but they do not necessarily explain why achieving those aims is important for broader knowledge or application. Hence, objectives is not the best term for the contribution-focused section described in the stem.

Option B:
The significance section links the study to existing literature and practical needs, showing how results might extend or refine current understanding. It often addresses who will benefit and in what ways. These functions align precisely with the description given in the question.

Option C:
Limitations outline anticipated weaknesses or constraints of the study, such as small sample size or limited generalisability, which is essentially the opposite of highlighting strengths and contributions. Therefore, limitations cannot complete the stem appropriately.

Option D:
Methodology describes the design, sampling, instruments and procedures to be used in the study. While it demonstrates how the research will be conducted, it does not primarily explain how the findings will contribute to knowledge or practice, so methodology is not correct here.

A well formulated research problem is specific enough to guide the study yet important enough to contribute meaningfully to knowledge or practice. It must be clearly worded so that objectives and hypotheses can be developed. At the same time, it should be manageable within the researcher’s time, financial and technical limitations.

Option A:
Option A is correct because it combines clarity, significance and feasibility, which are widely accepted criteria for a good problem.

Option B:
Option B suggests an overly broad and vague problem, which makes it difficult to design appropriate methods or interpret findings.

Option C:
Option C bases selection purely on fashion, which may ignore academic value and feasibility.

Option D:
Option D describes a problem that cannot be investigated under given constraints, which is impractical for a student researcher.