One of the classical maxims of teaching is “from simple to complex”, which suggests sequencing content so that learners first face easier material. As their understanding grows, they are gradually introduced to more difficult ideas. This progression supports confidence and prevents cognitive overload. Hence, when a teacher increases difficulty step by step, they are following the maxim from simple to complex.
Option A:
The phrase “from unknown to complex” is not a standard maxim of teaching and combines two challenging conditions for learners. Beginning with unknown material and ending with complex content would make learning unnecessarily difficult. Thus, “unknown” does not correctly complete the maxim in the stem.
Option B:
The word “abstract” belongs to the maxim “from concrete to abstract”, which focuses on moving from tangible experiences to theoretical concepts. The stem, however, ends with “to complex”, indicating a focus on difficulty rather than concreteness. Therefore, “abstract” is not the best choice here.
Option C:
The maxim “from concrete to complex” is not commonly recognized in teaching literature. “Concrete” relates to the tangible versus abstract nature of content, not directly to its level of difficulty. So this option does not align well with the phrase ending in “complex”.
Option D:
The phrase “from simple to complex” directly addresses the idea of increasing difficulty level as learners progress. Using “simple” at the beginning ensures that students can grasp the basics before tackling more sophisticated aspects. This option correctly completes the maxim referred to in the question.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!