UGC NET Questions (Paper – 1)

Policy analyses explain that banning low-utility, high-litter items addresses the worst offenders in terms of environmental harm. At the same time, raising thickness standards for some remaining plastics is intended to encourage reuse and make collection and recycling easier. Together, these measures move the system gradually towards reduced disposability and more circular designs. They exemplify how regulatory mixes can balance practicality with environmental ambition in a large developing economy.

Option A:
This option correctly interprets the policy mix as targeting unnecessary items while improving the design of others to support reuse and circularity. It recognises the nuanced approach rather than an all-or-nothing ban.

Option B:
This option is incorrect because the government has not attempted to eliminate all plastics within a year; many essential and regulated uses remain. A sudden total ban would be neither practical nor reflected in the rules.

Option C:
Increasing waste generation is the opposite of the policy’s purpose. The measures aim to reduce litter and total plastic usage, while making remaining items more sustainable.

Option D:
The ban and related standards apply to domestically used items and do not revolve primarily around import–domestic distinctions. The focus is on product characteristics and environmental impact.