Statements A, B, C, D and E correctly summarise the main pramÄášas in Indian thought, while F is false. Perception, inference, comparison and verbal testimony are widely accepted as distinct means of valid knowledge. Some schools, such as MÄŤmÄášsÄ and VedÄnta, add arthÄpatti (postulation) and anupalabdhi (non-cognition) as further pramÄášas. It is therefore wrong to claim that only perception is recognised everywhere; different schools endorse different sets. Thus A, B, C, D and E only is the correct combination.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete because it stops at A, B and C and does not acknowledge Ĺabda or the later additions of arthÄpatti and anupalabdhi. While perception, inference and comparison are important, verbal testimony and additional pramÄášas play significant roles in many systems. Therefore A, B and C only cannot be accepted.
Option B:
Option B is also incomplete, since it includes D but omits E, thereby leaving out the fact that some traditions recognise further pramÄášas beyond the main four. Without E, the description of pramÄáša theory across schools remains partial. Hence A, B, C and D only is not the full set of correct statements.
Option C:
Option C is incorrect because it treats F as true by including it with A, B, C and D. F claims that all schools accept only pratyakᚣa, which contradicts the wide use of inference, testimony and other pramÄášas in many systems. Including F makes the combination logically inconsistent with Indian epistemology.
Option D:
Option D is correct since it assembles A, B, C, D and E, capturing both the standard pramÄášas and the additional ones recognised by some schools, while excluding Fâs overgeneralisation. This option therefore matches the set of correct statements presented in the item.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!