Statements A, B, C, D and F are correct, while E is false. Constraints do limit possible arrangements, and considering extreme cases can quickly reveal options or impossibilities. Careful re-reading prevents misinterpretation of conditions, and recording partial conclusions helps avoid redundant work. UGC NET often embeds such constraints in short narrative puzzles. E is wrong because ignoring even one condition can easily lead to an incorrect or incomplete answer. Therefore A, B, C, D and F only is the correct combination.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete because it leaves out F, which accurately notes the narrative style of many exam puzzles. Though A, B, C and D describe good reasoning techniques, they do not mention how such tasks are framed. Thus A, B, C and D only cannot be accepted.
Option B:
Option B is correct as it combines the core methods for handling constraints with the exam-related fact that scenarios are often presented as short stories. It sensibly excludes E, which suggests a casual attitude to conditions that would be dangerous in test settings. This makes the option fully consistent with good practice.
Option C:
Option C is wrong because it includes E, implying that overlooking conditions is usually harmless, and it omits A. The omission of A removes the basic idea that constraints restrict possibilities, while accepting E undermines the whole purpose of systematic reasoning. Hence B, C, D, E and F only cannot be chosen.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect since it accepts E and omits B. Without B, the heuristic of checking boundary cases is not acknowledged, and with E the option recommends an error-prone approach. Therefore A, C, D, E and F only is not a valid answer.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!