Statements A, B and D correctly express principles of writing instructional objectives. A is true because action verbs such as “explain”, “classify” or “solve” describe observable behaviours. B is true as conditions (for example, “given a graph…”) clarify the context of performance. D is true because replacing vague verbs with specific ones makes objectives clearer and more assessable. C is wrong since specifying performance criteria helps teachers and learners know what level is expected, and E is wrong because overly broad, non-measurable objectives cannot effectively guide teaching or assessment. Thus C and E only are the wrong statements and form the correct answer.
Option A:
Option A picks C only and overlooks E, even though E also misguides objective writing by favouring unmeasurable statements. Since both C and E are incorrect, C only is not a complete answer.
Option B:
Option B selects E only and ignores C, which downplays the importance of performance standards in objectives. Because two statements are wrong, E only cannot be accepted.
Option C:
Option C groups B, C and E as wrong, but B is actually a correct guideline about including conditions in objectives. Including a true statement among wrong ones makes this option invalid.
Option D:
Option D correctly identifies C and E as the statements that conflict with established principles of behavioural objective writing. It keeps A, B and D separate as accurate statements, so C and E only is the correct option.
Option E adds A to the wrong set, even though A clearly describes a key feature of well-written objectives. Misclassifying A makes A, C and E only unacceptable.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!