Hetu is the middle term or reason whose presence in the paksha, together with known vyapti, justifies the conclusion that the sadhya is also present there. In the classic example, smoke functions as hetu for fire on the hill. A proper hetu must satisfy specific conditions to avoid fallacies. Therefore the inferential sign referred to in the stem is called hetu.
Option A:
Option A, paksha, is the subject in which the hetu and sadhya are discussed and does not itself function as the reason for the conclusion. Confusing the subject with the middle term would obscure the structure of inference.
Option B:
Option B is correct because hetu explicitly names the factor that serves as logical ground for the sadhya. Nyaya analysis of inference revolves around whether a proposed hetu genuinely exhibits vyapti with the probandum.
Option C:
Option C, sadhya, is the goal or probandum to be established and stands as the consequent of the argument, not the evidential basis.
Option D:
Option D, drstanta, is the illustrative example used to clarify the relation between hetu and sadhya and is distinct from the actual reason located in the paksha.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!