Q: Which of the following statements about pakṣa, sādhya and hetu in Indian logic are correct?
(A) In Indian inference, pakṣa is the subject or locus where the sādhya is to be proved;
(B) Sādhya is the probandum, the property that needs to be established in the pakṣa;
(C) Hetu is the middle term or reason by which the sādhya is inferred in the pakṣa;
(D) In the classic example “The hill has fire because it has smoke”, the hill is pakṣa, fire is sādhya and smoke is hetu;
(E) Sapakṣa refers to instances similar to the pakṣa where the sādhya is present, while vipakṣa refers to cases where the sādhya is absent;
(F) According to Nyaya, a hetu may still be valid even if it is entirely absent in the pakṣa, provided it appears elsewhere;
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Q: Which of the following statements about pakṣa, sapakṣa and vipakṣa in Indian inference are correct?
(A) Pakṣa is the subject or locus where the sādhya is to be proved;
(B) Sapakṣa refers to similar cases where the sādhya is known to be present;
(C) Vipakṣa refers to dissimilar cases where the sādhya is known to be absent;
(D) In all inferences, pakṣa and sapakṣa must be the same individual object;
(E) UGC NET questions may ask which of the given examples is sapakṣa or vipakṣa for a stated inference;
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!