Statement C is wrong because many trade agreements do contain environmental chapters, side agreements or provisions, and global forums increasingly integrate environmental concerns into trade rules. Statements A, B, D and E are correct: they refer to pollution haven risks, eco-labelling, the influence of foreign standards on domestic practices and ongoing debates about a race to the bottom. Hence, the combination that identifies C alone as wrong is the correct answer.
Option A:
Option A is incorrect as it labels both A and C as wrong. Statement A is correct in noting that under certain conditions industries may relocate to jurisdictions with weaker environmental regulations, a concern captured in the “pollution haven” hypothesis. Including a correct statement in the wrong set makes this option invalid.
Option B:
Option B is incorrect because it treats both C and D as wrong. While C is false, D is correct since exporters often adjust production processes to meet environmental standards of importing countries. Misclassifying D contradicts empirical evidence on trade and regulation.
Option C:
Option C is correct since it isolates C as the single incorrect statement and implicitly accepts A, B, D and E as reflecting real trade–environment interactions and debates. It matches the nuanced view expected at UGC NET level.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect as it groups B, C and D as wrong statements. B and D are both correct descriptions of how eco-labelling and external standards work, so this combination is inconsistent with the conceptual framework.
Option E is incorrect because it regards A, C and E as jointly wrong. E is correct in observing that there are ongoing debates about whether trade pressures can erode environmental standards, so including it in the wrong set makes the option unacceptable.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!