Statements A, B, C and D correctly summarise standard relationships on the traditional square of opposition, whereas E is false. Contradictory propositions cannot both be true and cannot both be false, and contraries cannot both be true but may both be false. “All S are P” versus “No S are P” are contraries, while “All S are P” versus “Some S are not P” are contradictories. The pair “Some S are P” and “No S are P” are also contradictories, not contraries, making E the only wrong statement.
Option A:
Option A is incorrect because it includes D as wrong along with E, but D accurately states a classic contradictory pair. Treating both D and E as wrong would misrepresent the structure of the square of opposition.
Option B:
Option B is also wrong since it marks C as wrong along with E, even though C correctly identifies “All S are P” and “No S are P” as contraries. C and E only therefore misclassifies a true statement as false.
Option C:
Option C is correct because it isolates E, the misidentified pair of contraries, as the sole incorrect statement and leaves the accurate descriptions in A, B, C and D untouched. This matches standard logic used in UGC NET preparation.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect as it groups C and D with E, thereby wrongly casting doubt on correctly named contrary and contradictory pairs. C, D and E only thus fails to preserve reliable information about AEIO relations.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!