The given relation can be written as x = k·y/√z for some constant k. Using x = 18 when y = 6 and z = 9, we have 18 = k·6/3, so 18 = 2k and k = 9. For y = 8 and z = 4, we get x = 9·8/√4 = 72/2 = 36. Thus, the new value of x is 36.
Option A:
Option A, 16, might be obtained by incorrectly treating the dependence on z as inverse linear (y/z) and misapplying the parameter values, but it does not follow from x = k·y/√z with k = 9. Substituting y = 8 and z = 4 into the correct formula clearly yields 36, not 16.
Option B:
Option B, 24, could arise from ignoring the square root and computing x = 9·8/3, but that would contradict the original pair (18, 6, 9) if we required a single consistent formula. The condition involves √z explicitly, so 24 is not compatible with that relationship.
Option C:
Option C, 30, does not match any straightforward misinterpretation of the formula that still respects both data points. When we use the correct k = 9 and plug in y = 8 and z = 4, we obtain 36, so 30 cannot be reconciled with the algebraic model.
Option D:
Option D is correct because it uses the same constant of proportionality derived from the first situation and correctly applies the dependence on y and √z. The computation 9·8/2 = 36 strictly follows x = k·y/√z and satisfies both given data conditions.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!