Statements A, B, D and F are correct, whereas C and E are false. Nyaya recognises four independent pramÄášas and treats comparison as a distinct source of knowledge based on similarity linking a word to its object. MÄŤmÄášsÄ and some VedÄnta schools add arthÄpatti and anupalabdhi, so D is correct. CÄrvÄka famously restricts itself mainly to perception and is sceptical about other pramÄášas, so E is wrong, and Nyaya extends verbal testimony beyond scripture to reliable persons generally, making C false. UGC NET questions often ask candidates to identify which items belong to Nyayaâs list.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete because it omits F, failing to mention the exam-style use of pramÄáša lists. While A, B and D correctly state Nyaya and MÄŤmÄášsÄ positions, they do not capture how this knowledge is tested. Therefore A, B and D only is not a fully satisfactory answer.
Option B:
Option B is correct as it includes A, B, D and F, the statements that align with standard presentations of Nyaya and related schools and that reflect the structure of UGC NET questions. It excludes C and E, both of which misrepresent the scope of verbal testimony and the CÄrvÄka position. Thus this option accurately lists the correct statements.
Option C:
Option C is wrong because it omits A, leaving out the basic statement of Nyayaâs four pramÄášas, and includes only B, D and F. Without A, the picture of Nyaya epistemology is incomplete. Hence B, D and F only cannot be the right combination.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect since it includes C, which wrongly restricts Nyaya Ĺabda to scripture alone, and omits Fâs contribution in other contexts. The presence of C introduces a clear error, making A, B, C, D and F only an unacceptable choice.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!