UGC NET Questions (Paper – 1)

The methodology for awarding green credits for tree plantation links credits to canopy density achieved after several years, rather than merely counting saplings. Credits are to be issued only if the plantation achieves around 40% canopy cover in the specified period, such as five years. This approach seeks to ensure that planted trees survive, grow and actually restore degraded areas, thereby delivering real ecological benefits. It moves beyond token plantations to focus on quality and long-term outcomes aligned with biodiversity and climate goals. (The Times of India)

Option A:
This option is incorrect because unmonitored planting often results in high mortality and limited ecological gain. The programme explicitly ties credits to measurable outcomes, not just initial planting numbers.

Option B:
Prioritising exotic monocultures can harm local biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. The broader policy discourse stresses native species and ecological integrity rather than simply maximising tree counts.

Option C:
Planting inside protected areas can be useful in some contexts, but the programme’s focus is on restoring degraded lands more broadly. Restricting eligible plantations only to protected areas would miss opportunities elsewhere and is not the central condition for credits.

Option D:
This option correctly reflects the requirement that plantations must reach a certain canopy density over time to qualify for credits. By tying credits to canopy cover and monitoring periods, the methodology promotes real restoration, survival and ecological functionality rather than symbolic planting drives.