Statements A, C and D correctly describe the NIRF ranking framework. Statement A is true because teaching, learning and resources form one of the major parameter groups in NIRF. Statement C is correct since NIRF publishes rankings for specific disciplines and also for overall institutional performance. Statement D is also true because by publishing comparative rankings, NIRF seeks to foster quality consciousness, healthy competition and accountability, whereas statement B is false as participation is policy-driven and voluntary, not a constitutional compulsion.
Option A:
Option A is correct because it aggregates the three statements that align with the official design and intent of NIRF. It accurately reflects the parameter structure, the discipline-wise and overall lists, and the quality-promoting purpose of the rankings. By excluding B, it avoids the exaggeration that participation is constitutionally mandatory.
Option B:
Option B is incorrect because it includes statement B, which wrongly suggests a constitutional obligation to participate in NIRF. The Constitution does not impose such a specific requirement on institutions. Therefore this combination mixes correct information with a clearly incorrect claim.
Option C:
Option C is incorrect because it treats B, C and D as correct statements. While C and D are true, Bβs assertion about compulsory participation is wrong. Including a false statement prevents this option from being the right answer.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it recognises only A and D and omits C. Discipline-specific rankings are a distinctive feature of NIRF that help stakeholders compare institutions within specific fields. Leaving this element out makes the description incomplete.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!