NyÄya distinguishes prior non existence (prÄgabhÄva), posterior non existence (pradhvaį¹sÄbhÄva), mutual non existence (anyonyÄbhÄva) and absolute non existence (atyantÄbhÄva). Eternal absence of impossible entities such as āhorns of a hareā is the standard example of atyantÄbhÄva, since such things are absent in all places and at all times.
Option A:
Option A reverses the terms: the absence after destruction is pradhvaį¹sÄbhÄva, not prÄgabhÄva.
Option B:
Option B also reverses: absence before production is prÄgabhÄva, not pradhvaį¹sÄbhÄva.
Option C:
Option C correctly matches atyantÄbhÄva with the eternal absence of āhorns of a hareā on any real animal.
Option D:
Option D misuses anyonyÄbhÄva; mutual non existence concerns, for example, āpot is not cloth and cloth is not pot,ā not the temporal absence of a pot on a floor.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!