In traditional logic, a universal affirmative proposition has the form โAll S are Pโ. It makes a positive claim about every member of the subject class. Such propositions are symbolised as A-type in the square of opposition. Therefore the proposition described in the stem is a universal affirmative.
Option A:
Option A, particular affirmative, asserts something about some members of a class, as in โSome S are Pโ. It does not cover all members and so cannot match the description in the question.
Option B:
Option B correctly names universal affirmative as the proposition that affirms a predicate of every member of the subject class. This aligns perfectly with the phrase โall members of a classโ. Hence it is the correct answer.
Option C:
Option C, particular negative, denies a predicate about some members, as in โSome S are not Pโ. It changes both the quantity and quality from what the stem states. Thus particular negative is not appropriate.
Option D:
Option D, universal negative, denies something of all members, as in โNo S are Pโ. While universal in scope, it is not affirmative in quality. Therefore universal negative does not fit the description.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!