Wikis for collaborative learning – UGC NET Question

Statements A, B and D correctly describe the pedagogical potential of wikis, while statement C is false. Wikis support co-authoring, record edits through revision histories and benefit from clear guidelines and rubrics. The claim that they can never be used for group projects contradicts widespread practice in higher education. Thus, the correct combination is A, B and D only.

Option A:
Option A is incomplete because it includes only A and B and omits D. Although collaborative editing and revision histories are core features, instructor guidance and assessment criteria are also crucial for productive wiki use. Without D, the description of wiki-based learning is partial.

Option B:
Option B is correct because it collects A, B and D, the three true statements about wikis in education, and excludes C, which wrongly denies their role in group projects. It recognises both technical affordances and necessary pedagogical supports.

Option C:
Option C includes B and D only and leaves out A, even though A states the central collaborative feature of wikis. Since A is fundamental to understanding why wikis are used in learning, this option does not provide a complete picture.

Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it accepts all four statements as correct, thereby endorsing C. As C incorrectly asserts that wikis cannot support group work, this combination cannot be considered accurate.