Upamāna is the means of knowing the relation between a word and its object through similarity or comparison. The classic case is where someone hears “a gavaya is like a cow but lives in the forest,” and later on seeing such an animal, recognises “this is a gavaya.” The cognition depends on comparing the new object with the known cow and linking it to the word. This process is neither mere testimony nor ordinary inference.
Option A:
Option A is a case of inference from smoke to fire and does not involve learning a new word’s reference by comparison.
Option B:
Option B correctly captures the gavaya example where similarity between the seen animal and a cow enables identification through upamāna.
Option C:
Option C exemplifies śabda pramāṇa, where scripture gives knowledge through verbal testimony, not through comparison.
Option D:
Option D is an instance of memory, which recalls a past event rather than generating new word–object knowledge via similarity.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!