The understanding level of teaching stresses that learners should grasp the meanings of concepts rather than merely repeat them. At this level, students can interpret information, explain ideas in their own words and see relationships between facts. The teacher uses examples, analogies and questions to check whether genuine comprehension has been achieved. Because the stem highlights comprehension, interpretation and explanation, it clearly indicates the understanding level of teaching.
Option A:
Memory level teaching focuses mainly on reproducing information as it was presented, with little demand for interpretation or explanation. Students might answer “what” questions but struggle with “why” and “how” questions. Thus, it does not match the emphasis on understanding described in the stem.
Option B:
Reflective level teaching expects learners to engage in critical inquiry, problem-solving and hypothesis formation. It involves dealing with complex, ill-structured problems and making original judgments. This goes beyond the basic comprehension focus of the stem, so reflective level is not the best fit here.
Option C:
Understanding level teaching involves moving learners from rote recall to meaningful learning. Students can restate ideas, summarise texts and illustrate concepts with their own examples. Since the question mentions interpreting meanings and explaining in one’s own words, this option correctly identifies the level.
Option D:
Drill level is not a standard label in the commonly cited tri-level classification of teaching. The word “drill” suggests repetitive practice, which is closer to memory level than to comprehension-oriented teaching. Therefore, it is not an appropriate name for the level described.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!