Social constructivism, inspired by Vygotsky, emphasises that learning occurs through social interaction, language and collaboration. Knowledge is not simply transmitted from teacher to student; it is co-constructed as learners engage in dialogue and shared activities. Classroom practices such as group discussion, peer tutoring and collaborative projects embody this perspective. Therefore, the view in the stem aligns with the social constructivist perspective on learning.
Option A:
Behaviourist perspectives stress observable behaviour changes resulting from reinforcement and punishment rather than co-construction of meaning. They often focus on individual responses to stimuli and do not give central importance to dialogue or shared activities. Hence, behaviourism does not match the description in the question.
Option B:
Social constructivist viewpoints argue that cultural tools and social interaction shape thinking, and that understanding emerges through negotiation of meaning. When students discuss, argue and collaborate, they build shared knowledge structures. Since the stem points to knowledge being co-constructed through dialogue and collaboration, this option correctly labels the perspective.
Option C:
Maturationist theories emphasise biological growth and readiness, suggesting that development follows a natural sequence largely independent of specific learning experiences. While maturation sets limits, it does not itself explain the role of collaborative activities in constructing knowledge. Thus, maturationist is not an appropriate answer here.
Option D:
Authoritarian approaches to education focus on control and obedience, often restricting learner input and dialogue. Such environments can hinder the kind of collaborative sense-making central to social constructivism. Consequently, authoritarian is the opposite of the perspective described in the stem.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!