From a:b = 2:3, let a = 2k and b = 3k. From b:c = 4:5, let b = 4m and c = 5m. Equating b gives 3k = 4m, so we choose k = 4 and m = 3 to get a = 8, b = 12 and c = 15. Then (a + b) = 20 and (b + c) = 27, so the required ratio is 20:27. This ratio is unique after we bring the two given ratios to a common middle term.
Option A:
Option A, 14:19, does not arise from any consistent choice of a, b and c that satisfies both 2:3 and 4:5 as the given ratios. If we attempt to back-calculate from 14:19, the implied values of a, b and c will violate at least one of the original relationships. Hence 14:19 is not compatible with the data.
Option B:
Option B is correct because it is computed after properly equalising the middle term b in both ratios. The method ensures that b plays the same role in both proportional relationships before forming (a + b) and (b + c). This leads precisely to 20:27 as the resulting ratio of the sums.
Option C:
Option C, 7:9, looks like a simplified ratio but does not match the actual numerical values 20 and 27 obtained from solving. Any attempt to assign a, b and c consistent with 7:9 will contradict the starting ratios 2:3 and 4:5. Therefore 7:9 cannot represent (a + b):(b + c).
Option D:
Option D, 3:4, is unrelated to the sums and instead resembles a typical simple ratio. When we compute (a + b) and (b + c) using the correct method, their ratio is not reducible to 3:4. Thus, 3:4 is not the correct resultant ratio.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!