From a:b = 7:9, we can take a = 7k and b = 9k. From b:c = 3:4, take b = 3m and c = 4m. Equating b gives 9k = 3m, so m = 3k and c = 4m = 12k. Now a + b = 7k + 9k = 16k and b + c = 9k + 12k = 21k. Therefore, (a + b):(b + c) = 16:21.
Option A:
Option A, 7:9, simply restates the original a:b ratio and does not consider the contributions from c in b + c. Because the question asks for the ratio of sums, not of individual terms, 7:9 fails to capture the required combined relationships.
Option B:
Option B is correct because it arises from expressing a, b and c in terms of a single parameter k that satisfies both given ratios. Only after this alignment can we reliably compute a + b and b + c. The final ratio 16:21 cannot be obtained by any shortcut that ignores this common scaling step.
Option C:
Option C, 4:7, might be guessed by incorrectly mixing the numerators of the given ratios, but it is not supported by the actual expressions for a + b and b + c. Substituting 4:7 back into the linked equations fails to reproduce the original ratios.
Option D:
Option D, 5:7, is another arbitrary-looking pair that does not emerge from the algebraic derivation. Computing a + b and b + c explicitly shows that their ratio is 16:21, not 5:7, so this option is inconsistent with the calculation.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!