Logical quantifiers usage – UGC NET Question

Statements A, B, C and E correctly describe how quantifiers are treated in logic and in the exam, while D is false. Logical “some” is inclusive and allows the possibility that all elements satisfy the predicate, even if conversational usage often suggests otherwise. The universal “all” and “no” correspond to familiar A and E categorical forms, and careful attention to these meanings is essential for solving UGC NET syllogism questions. Thus the combination that includes all true statements and excludes D is A, B, C, E only.

Option A:
Option A is correct because it gathers the logically accurate descriptions of “all”, “some” and “no” and emphasises exam importance, while omitting the misleading claim in D. It reflects both formal semantics and practical test-taking needs.

Option B:
Option B is incomplete since it leaves out E, failing to mention the explicit role quantifiers play in UGC NET question interpretation. A, B, C only therefore does not fully answer the question.

Option C:
Option C is wrong because it omits A, dropping the clear linkage between “all” and universal statements, and so B, C, E only presents only part of the correct picture. Missing A is significant because universal claims are central to categorical logic.

Option D:
Option D is also incorrect as it excludes B, leaving out the crucial clarification that logical “some” does not automatically imply “not all”. A, C, E only is therefore not the full set of true statements.