The condition “x varies inversely as the square of y” means x = k/y² for some constant k. Using x = 9 when y = 2, we get 9 = k/4, so k = 36. For y = 3, we have x = 36/3² = 36/9 = 4. Therefore, the new value of x corresponding to y = 3 is 4.
Option A:
Option A, 3, would correspond to x = 36/y² giving 3 = 36/y², so y² = 12, which does not match y = 3. Hence, 3 cannot be the value of x when y is 3 under this variation law.
Option B:
Option B is correct because it uses the constant k = 36 derived from the first pair (x, y) = (9, 2) and substitutes y = 3 appropriately. The computation 36/9 is straightforward and yields 4, which fully respects the inverse-square relationship between x and y.
Option C:
Option C, 6, could result from treating x as inversely proportional to y instead of y², leading to x = 18/3. However, that would violate the stated condition involving the square of y, and it does not satisfy x = 9 when y = 2 if we consistently use the same rule.
Option D:
Option D, 8, might arise from doubling 4 under the mistaken belief that x halves when y increases from 2 to 3, but inverse-square variation is more rapid than simple inverse variation. The correct calculation yields 4, not 8, so this option is not consistent with the given dependency.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!