The rule for this series alternates between multiplying by 2 and adding 1, and multiplying by 2 and subtracting 1. Specifically, 4Γ2+1 = 9, 9Γ2β1 = 17, 17Γ2+1 = 35 and 35Γ2β1 = 69. Following this alternation, the next step must again be βΓ2+1β. Thus, the next term is 69Γ2+1 = 139.
Option A:
Option A gives 137, which would correspond to 69Γ2β1. That operation was used in the previous step and would break the established alternation between β+1β and ββ1β adjustments. Therefore 137 does not preserve the correct recursive pattern.
Option B:
Option B gives 141, which cannot be obtained from 69 by a simple βΓ2Β±1β rule. It would require 69Γ2+3, introducing a new constant and disrupting the elegant Β±1 structure. Hence 141 is not a valid continuation.
Option C:
Option C gives 139, exactly equal to 69Γ2+1. This follows the alternating rule β+1, β1, +1, β1, +1β consistently from term to term. Because it respects the specific recursive behaviour, 139 is the correct next term in the series.
Option D:
Option D gives 143, which would equal 69Γ2+5 and bring in a new additive adjustment that has not appeared earlier. This contradicts the simple and regular nature of the rule, so 143 cannot be accepted.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!