Each term in the series can be represented as n² − 1 for successive integers n starting from 2. For n = 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 we get 2² − 1 = 3, 3² − 1 = 8, 4² − 1 = 15, 5² − 1 = 24 and 6² − 1 = 35. The next integer is 7, so the next term should be 7² − 1, which equals 49 − 1 = 48. This keeps the expression governing the series intact.
Option A:
Option A gives 46, which is not of the form n² − 1 for any integer that naturally follows 6 in the progression. Using 46 would break the simple relationship between term position and value. Hence, 46 is not consistent with the pattern.
Option B:
Option B yields 48, matching 7² − 1 and continuing the formula-based structure. The extended sequence 3, 8, 15, 24, 35, 48 clearly corresponds to 2² − 1 through 7² − 1. Therefore, 48 is the correct next term.
Option C:
Option C suggests 50, which has no direct explanation in terms of the n² − 1 rule for the next integer. It introduces a deviation from the well-defined polynomial pattern. Thus, 50 cannot be accepted as correct.
Option D:
Option D presents 52, which again does not correspond to 7² − 1 and appears arbitrary relative to the rest of the series. Choosing 52 would disrupt the simple square-based relationship. Therefore, 52 is not appropriate.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!